Federal agency OKs study, public comment on proposed Lake Powell Pipeline

Stock image | St. George News

ST. GEORGE – The Lake Powell Pipeline flows a little closer to reality as federal regulators said Monday they are moving forward with an environmental analysis of the project.

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, announced it had accepted the hydropower license application for the pipeline project that was submitted last year by the state. The commission will be initiating an environmental study to determine the project’s feasibility. A public comment period will last into early February.

Lake Powell is at its lowest point in several years, Page, Ariz., photo undated | Stock image, St. George News

The proposed 140-mile long, 70-inch diameter pipeline is designed to taken water from Lake Powell to Sand Hollow Reservoir in Washington County. The pipeline is anticipated to bring 77 million gallons of water daily to 13 communities in Washington and Kane counties.

According to FERC, the pipeline will carry water 50 miles uphill from Lake Powell to a high point in the Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument, with the remaining 90 miles running through a series of hydroelectric turbines on the way to Sand Hollow.

“This is a major milestone toward meeting Southern Utah’s need to diversify its water supply and develop additional resources to meet anticipated demand,” said Eric Millis, Utah Division of Water Resources director. “Permitting a water project is a lengthy process and this is a significant step.”

Communities in Washington County get their water from a single source – the Virgin River. State and county water planners have said for years that the county needs to diversify its water resources, especially in light of expected growth in population.

Read more: Negotiations begin for ‘water exchange’ key to the Lake Powell Pipeline

Washington County is projected to have a population of 400,000 by 2060. The Washington County Water Conservancy District has said the development of current water resources and conservation will only be able to make up a little over half of the water supply needed to sustain a population that size. The Lake Powell Pipeline, water district officials say, will be able to supply the rest.

A proposed route for the Lake Powell Pipeline | Image courtesy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, St. George News

FERC has overseen the application due to the six hydroelectric turbine generation stations to be built along the pipeline’s route. Those facilities will supply some of the energy to power pump stations moving water through the pipeline.

While the commission has jurisdiction over those facilities, it stated Monday that it is reviewing whether it has jurisdiction over the rest of the project’s components.

Zach Frankel, executive director of the Utah Rivers Council and a longtime pipeline opponent, told The Salt Lake Tribune that if other federal agencies become involved, the pipeline could face more intense National Environmental Policy Act review.

FERC spokeswoman Celeste Miller said the commission plans to produce documentation required by other agencies, such as the National Park Service and the Bureau of Land Management.

Those agencies, along with others under the U.S. Interior Department, are already heavily involved in the process, said Ron Thompson, general manager of the Washington County Water Conservancy District.

“In terms of significance, it really won’t make any difference,” Thompson said.

The process of establishing jurisdiction over the project in whole or in part is a way for the agencies to determine which one will be the lead agency overseeing the project, he said.

“It really shouldn’t make much difference in the long run,” Thompson said, adding that he expects to see the environmental study to finish sometime in 2019 with a conclusion favoring the Lake Powell Pipeline.

If all goes well, construction on the pipeline could begin in the early 2020s.

FERC has opened a public comment period lasting 60 days of the issuance of the go-ahead for the environmental study. Those wishing to comment can visit the agency’s website. The project number is P-12966-004.

The Associated Press contributed to this story.

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @MoriKessler

Copyright St. George News, SaintGeorgeUtah.com LLC, 2017, all rights reserved.

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!


  • utahdiablo December 14, 2017 at 8:34 pm

    Ahhh….400,000 people here in Washington County, doesn’t it just make you feel all warm and fuzzy inside? …The greed machine is at full steam…steam rolling over your quality of life people,… oh well, enjoy!

  • mesaman December 14, 2017 at 9:50 pm

    I find it truly saddening to agree with your comments, UD. Saddening because I do NOT want unbridled growth in the county at large and St George in particular. In fact I am the anti voice to growth at all. I expect this will draw the whiners out of the woodwork but it won’t change my position on growth and the Lake Powell Pipeline. Wouldn’t it be cheaper just to erect an enormous statue of Ron Thompson and let the developers and other land pimps struggle elsewhere.

  • Waid December 14, 2017 at 9:57 pm

    Local & state government officials — lackeys of the chamber of commerce — want their shiny new toy pipeline so that wealthy developers, builders, and contractors can continue to line their pockets at the expense of ordinary people. Officials have been shown over and over how Washington county can easily double and triple its current population without spending billions of dollars on a pipeline to Lake Powell. Water conservation and conversion of irrigation water rights can provide the water that is needed for decades of growth. But, driven by extreme greed, officials cannot be dissuaded from a path that will ultimately cost all county property owners dearly as the water district radically increases property taxes to pay for construction and operation of the extremely expensive and unnecessary pipeline. Even if there isn’t a drop of water to be had in Lake Powell, Washington County taxpayers will still foot the bill for the pipeline.

    Of course, restricting growth to a reasonable rate rather than encouraging the rampant, out-of-control growth we are currently experiencing would also go a long way towards stretching our water resources. The chamber of commerce won’t allow their lap dogs in government to even mention such a “radical” concept, though!

    Waid Reynolds

    • Lee Sanders December 15, 2017 at 9:30 am

      I couldn’t agree with you more, Waid. Keep Jeepin’

  • Scorch December 15, 2017 at 7:14 am

    I see three comments above that reference greed and unbridled growth. Both of which are thrown around a lot to besmirch and belittle the pipeline and anyone supporting it.
    No one in this county wants unbridled growth, suggesting that they do is just a scare tactic. It’s also completely illogical, we have water now and are we seeing unbridled growth? The county will continue to grow as it has always done. Those that speak against any kind of growth are saddled with “first settler syndrome.”. I have my little slice of heaven, now don’t let anyone else come here and ruin it.
    Greed. Is it greed to want to make money? How are you feeding your family of you don’t make money? Land development is a risky business, I think we should be grateful to anyone willing to risk it all to provide you a place to live. If the reward wasn’t potentially great, then no one would do it.
    All the professionals agree that the county will run out of available water at some point. That point is not up for discussion. We can do better, but we cannot conserve our way to zero and sooner or later the local resources will not be enough.
    Can we not get together and find a way to help this area that we love to continue to be great?

    • Lee Sanders December 15, 2017 at 9:59 am

      Scorch, I don’t think most folks in the County are suffering your “first settler syndrome”. I think what most folks are concerned about is this region becoming another Salt Lake City/Las Vegas/Los Angeles type environmental disaster. I’d also like to see crime statistics as our population increases. I’m betting it will increase at least proportionally. We are already starting to see more morning haze and definitely seeing increasing traffic. Our past and current traffic levels will be a pleasant memory if they get the 400,000 people here like they want. As an example of what we will see more of, those with the power and connections are clamoring for a new highway through the tortoise reserve. Everywhere one looks is what most would call “unbridled” construction. If you don’t see it, you need to get out and look. I’m suspecting that it won’t stop until all developable land is built up and then those powers that be will go for the Federal lands so the “unbridled” build-out can continue. Many folks have come up with suggestions such as limiting building permits but none of those seem to get much traction as long as there’s more money to be made. (I’m definitely not against folks making a good living, but how much is enough?) I’ve talked with contractor friends and they would prefer a slow but steady growth without the boom/bust cycles like we’ve had in the recent past. They’re concerned about what happens to their livelihood when all the developable land is gone. We may very likely see a major giveaway of hundreds of acres on the popular Sand Mountain Off-Highway-Vehicle area in Hurricane as part of this “we’ve got to grow or we die” syndrome. If you think bringing in more people will deepen our tax base, not so. More people, especially with school age children cost more than the taxes they contribute. Industry, the contrary, but not the young working families needed to support the desired development. I’d guess what the slow the growth folks are saying is something like, “We have a right to have our quality of life protected, too.”

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.