ST. GEORGE – Due to concerns over alleged “recent acts of intimidation and violence,” the Utah GOP asked the state’s congressional delegation last week to either delay holding town hall meetings or hold tele-town halls instead.
The state GOP repeated those concerns again Monday, citing an advisory from the House Sergeant at Arms last Thursday telling members of Congress to maintain “enhanced security awareness.”
The advisory comes in the wake of raucous town hall meetings in which House Republicans have been blasted in their home districts over potentially getting rid of the Affordable Care Act. Some cases have also involved a general opposition toward other objectives of President Donald Trump and his administration.
“This advisory comes after multiple accounts of disruptive behavior from town hall attendees primarily targeting congressional Republicans including Utah’s own Rep. Jason Chaffetz,” Utah GOP Chair James Evans said in the statement released Monday.
This week is what is generally referred to as a “district work period” in which members of Congress return to their native turf and tend to hold town hall meetings or similar events with constituents.
Chaffetz held a town hall meeting Feb. 9 at Brigham High School in Cottonwood Heights that was packed and overflowing. Over 1,000 made it into the town hall meeting while several hundred more were stuck outside, according to Fox 13 News.
Chaffetz was meeting with angry constituents who disrupted and booed him. One man asked Chaffetz why he would call Trump “despicable,” and yet the Ethics Committee does not investigate him. This question drew the biggest outcry from the crowd, Fox 13 reported.
At that point, those inside started chanting at Chaffetz to “Do your job, do your job, do your job.”
While the commotion unfolded inside, hundreds of people were kept outside due to fire code regulations.
As for disruptions and suspect activity at the event, one incident involved a woman who was arrested for rushing police and trying to get inside the school. Another incident involved individuals who were openly carrying sidearms while trying to start a scene, Cottonwood Heights Police told Fox 13 News
While openly carrying a firearm in Utah is legal, two to three armed individuals using bandannas to cover the lower part of their faces tried to get the crowd to rush the police once they closed the doors to the school.
“People weren’t having it, for the most part everyone was very kind with us, a lot of people shook our hands,” Cottonwoods Heights Police Lt. Dan Bartlett told Fox 13 News. When police were made aware of the men and began to approach them, the men left the area. Officers did not pursue the men and no arrests were made.
In a press conference last week, the Utah GOP accused a group called Utah Indivisible for hijacking Chaffetz’s town hall meeting by sending an “organized mob” meant to sow disruption and chaos. The Utah GOP also compiled a list of alleged acts of intimidation and violence they accused the group of committing at the Chaffetz town hall.
Utah Indivisible organizers responded to the Utah Republican Party in a Facebook Live stream and rejected the party’s claims.
“We have been monitoring the social media pages of ‘leftist groups’ who are actively identifying, plotting, and recruiting, for the sole purpose of targeting Utah’s own Republican elected officials if they have scheduled town hall meetings or other public events,” Evans said in Monday’s statement.
“These groups are seeking an opportunity to flood these events with their own activists who have historically displayed disruptive and disorderly behavior,” he continued.
The Utah GOP also accused the Utah Democratic Party of taking part in organizing protest mobs.
Lauren Littlefield, executive director of the Utah Democratic Party, issued a response to the claim:
The Utah Democratic Party doesn’t condone all of the behavior displayed at Congressman Chaffetz’s recent town hall meeting, but the accusation that Utah Democrats organized an angry mob is ludicrous and an ‘alternative fact.’ We are not currently working with Utah Indivisible though we do appreciate the immense grassroots organization that has sprung up since the Nov. 8 Election.
Another example the Utah GOP gave of groups allegedly causing trouble was an incident in California earlier this month involving Rep. Tom McClintock. According to the Washington Examiner, McClintock required a police escort after a town hall meeting due to concerns over a group of people demonstrating outside the town hall.
The issue of protesters at congressional Republican town halls has even caught the attention of President Trump, who took to Twitter (to the surprise of no one), posting: “The so-called angry crowds in home districts of some Republicans are actually, in numerous cases, planned out by liberal activists. Sad!”
The so-called angry crowds in home districts of some Republicans are actually, in numerous cases, planned out by liberal activists. Sad!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 21, 2017
If Utah’s congressional delegation begins to hold more tele-town hall meetings as the Utah Republican Party advises, it will be nothing new for some of them. Sen. Mike Lee has held them since 2013, with the next one scheduled for March 8. More information can be found on the senator’s website.
Rep. Chris Stewart also recently held a tele-town hall meeting hosted by the Dixie Republican Forum. While appearing via video feed, the Republican congressman was still hammered by a mix of constituents over concerns related to the potential repeal and replacement of the Affordable Care Act.
“Utahns are well known for their civility, respect for their fellow citizens, elected officials and law enforcement,” Evans said. “What we are witnessing is not representative of Utah values, instead it is merely left-wing ideologists attempting to force their rhetoric on a population that has already made their decision at the ballot box.”
Email: [email protected]
Twitter: @MoriKessler
Copyright St. George News, SaintGeorgeUtah.com LLC, 2017, all rights reserved.
The GOP only likes civil discourse if it is with those whom they agree. Anyone who doesn’t support their policies they ignore or disparage.
CHICKENS!!!!
Do all you mormons realize that your beloved Orrin hatch has now been your senator over 40 years?!!! Disgusting!
You mormons officially have 0 right to complain about corrupt career politicians. Your mormon senator is the worst offender. 40 solid years of self-serving corruption. hahahah
He’s probably got a billion dollars socked away from all those bribes and kickbacks. after 40 years(!!!) he easily could.
Enter; The local whinos. Oh if only he had a brain.
and another one of Bob’s stupid comments
Republicans,
This article raises an interesting question, maybe one of you can answer for me,
Why does a bunch of Americans telling you to do the job we hired you to do scare you?
You do realize we just went through 8 years of the most tone-deaf administration in US history, right? This isn’t an (R) or (D) problem, it’s a politician problem. That’s why an independent, honest media asking hard-hitting questions was so important. That’s now dead forever (also killed in the last 8 years).
You confuse rejection of your extreme worldview with tone deafness.
Republicans scared of unhappy constituents. Prefer only Fox News interviews. Sad.
Nope. The problem is the radical, violent left that doesn’t want to hear another side of the story. They’d rather yell, destroy personal property, burn and stomp on the American flag and use violent tyrannical means to get their point across.
Conservatives don’t resort to these means, they just quietly carry (*their concealed firearms) and are ready to step up when the Flag, the Constitution and our God is under attack.
*I know this will get the ire of you progressive liberals. Enjoy it.
So everyone left of you is radical, violent, anarchist, flag hating, atheist and a liberal progressive? OK got it.
I hardly think that not one radical, violent, anarchist, flag hating, atheist and a liberal progressive voted Republican, right?
Right.
Small comfort to know you are packing and are convinced guns will save the republic.
You say the “radical, violent left…[would]rather yell, destroy personal property, burn and stomp on the American flag and use violent tyrannical means to get their point across.”
Conservatives don’t resort to these means,” you assert, “they just quietly carry (*their concealed firearms) and are ready to step up when the Flag, the Constitution and our God is under attack.
I guess you’ve forgotten about the time Cliven Bundy and his band of right-wing cowards and wannabe soldiers took over a bird sanctuary in Oregon. What part of the Flag, Constitution or God was “under attack” then?
I’ll never forget the time that a former Arizona sheriff bragged to Fox News that “he and other protestors”were planning to put women in the front at Bundy ranch in 2014
Here’s proof
Here’s further proof
Bender recommends the Utah Legislature fund safe spaces for our delicate congressmen. These hideaways would be staffed by sycophant college republican volunteers and only allow Fox News, Infowars and Breitbart internet access. Will someone please think of the pain these brave men and woman must be suffering right now?????
Better still fund corrals for the lunatic fringe that was once the democrat party.
Let’s be honest. The angry crowd at Jason Chaffetz’ town hall meeting were there to make sure no one opposing their liberal agenda was able to speak. Or, should we have followed the example of the hired opposition and brought guns and dressed up as cowboy outlaws, which was done by Chaffetz’s town hall distractors?
So anyone who is not on board with Chaffetz is a liberal and opposition crowds always contain paid actors? I’m guessing Trump got your vote.
Trump got the American vote as well. That’s what counts.
Deal with it.
Accept it.
Your party and your candidate was too corrupt and evil.
My party? Which party would that be?
“Trump got the American vote as well. That’s what counts”.
Wrong.
A majority of Americans (millions more in fact) voted for Hilary Clinton.
Wow, I’ve uncovered two radical snowflakes….
I’m ashamed to say that I voted Hillary, not that I supported a majority of her positions, but that I despise the republican party, and now I despise the democrats after figuring out they are no different from republicans. All of them are horrible. I hope Trump succeeds. deport deport deport. LOL
Bob, I can’t believe you admitted that LOL. I hate politics that’s why I voted for Trump. Close the borders, protect Americans, deport illegals…no more special treatment to illegals!
Politics is politics, dirty rotten scoundrels but if he can accomplish one campaign promise, he’s a success.
I’ve never seen so many people against a President fulfilling his campaign promises lol
@Utahguns
If using things like verifiable facts to counter your hypocritical rhetoric makes me a “radical snowflake” than I say….
THANKS FOR THE COMPLIMENT! ♥
Have a nice day. 🙂
Townhall meetings are a valuable means for both citizens to air their concerns and politicians to get face-to-face feedback. It’s obvious that leftist groups are targeting town halls as a means to bloviate – but that’s their right, as long as they don’t try to take over the meeting and aren’t a security threat.
Continue the police presence at the townhalls and escort out the wannabe anarchists. I would add a requirement to screen participants at the door for proof of residency in the congressional district (for congressional townhalls), to preclude bussing in professional agitators. Then man-up, politicians!
Easy there Henry, despite what you read on Breitbart and hear on Fox News, Utah congressmen are not being harassed by anarchists or bused in agitators at town hall meetings. I know from your perspective anyone left of Jason Chaffetz is left-wing but you are leaving out a broad swath of moderate voters — Republians, Independents and Democrats — who are by no reasonable definition of the term left-wing.
But thanks for being in favor of free speech. :-/
You should try news sources besides Daily Kos and The Nation, Bender. If you want to continue in denial about the “mob for hire” people and about Hillary not winning, that’s your prerogative.
I think that I’d be considered much more “moderate” than you on many issues. I used to be a registered Democrat here in Washington County. I’m not a Chaffetz fan and would rather enjoy seeing him squirm at a townhall meeting. The same way that I made Hillary supporters squirm when I was standing in line and talking with them, as we were waiting to vote in last summer’s Democratic Primary election. Were you one of the ones I talked to? LOL
“violence and intimidation” What violence? People yelling? If Chaffetz was intimidated then he should find another line of work.
“What we are witnessing is not representative of Utah values …” What Evans considers Utah values is to vote R, then believe and passively accept everything your Lords and Masters in Washington tell you and come out from under your rock only when it is time again to vote R and write checks.
@ Utahguns. Actually, Clinton got Americas vote by nearly three million unless, of course, you count the three to five millions illegal votes cast for Clinton.
You hit it on the head….the three to five millions illegal votes cast for Clinton.
Best logical comment you’re made.
Despite this assertion about illegal votes being made countless times by Trump, it is simply not true. Trump and his diehard supporters live in a strange bubble of outright lies. Hard for me to fathom how otherwise normal adults would buy into this. Once a birther, always a birther I guess.
Bill Clinton didn’t receive a majority of votes in 1992 or 1996. Did that lessen his legitimacy as President?
The Obama Birther claim was originated by a Hillary Clinton supporter.
Oh Henry,
You say, “Bill Clinton didn’t receive a majority of votes in 1992 or 1996.”
Wrong.
Here are the facts:
In 1992, Bill Clinton took approximately 43% of the vote, Bush took 37 and Perot took 19 and the rest went to other candidates.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1992
http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?year=1992&f=0&off=0&elect=0
In 1996 Clinton took a full 49%, Dole took 40% and Perot took 8%.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1996
http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe1996/elecpop.htm
You say “The Obama Birther claim was originated by a Hillary Clinton supporter”.
Everything I could find led me to believe that claim, like your previous one, is false.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1978110/posts?page=391#391
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-started-birther-movement/
Oh Rainbow Dash, I stated the real (not fantasy) facts. Do you have difficulty understanding the English language?
“Definition of majority for English Language Learners: a number that is greater than half of a total. : a number of votes that is more than half of the total number.” https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/majority
Since Bill Clinton received less than half of the vote in both 1992 and 1996, he did not receive a majority in either year. Q.E.D.
I’m not surprised that you couldn’t find anything linking Clinton supporters to the birther movement, since you cited only two leftist sources. Here are excerpts from several more mainstream, credible sources:
– “The idea of going after Obama’s otherness dates back to the last presidential election — and to Democrats. Long before Trump started in, Hillary Clinton’s chief strategist, Mark Penn, recognized this potential vulnerability in Obama and sought to exploit it.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-05-30/the-democratic-roots-of-the-birther-movement
– This claim was first advanced by diehard Hillary Clinton supporters as her campaign for the party’s nomination faded.”
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/11/its-official-obama-born-in-the-usa/
– It is also true that it was aggravated Clinton supporters who first raised the claim that Obama was not born in the U.S.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/09/16/no-hillary-clinton-did-not-start-birther-movement/90500762/
Do you need help extracting your foot from your mouth? LOL
Henry,
The facts are that more people ( a majority according to webster) voted for Clinton in 1992 and 1996 than any other candidate. Thank you for providing the link to the definition of “majority” Here’s the rest of the definition:
3
a : a number or percentage equaling more than half of a total
b : the excess of a majority over the remainder of the total : margin
c : the greater quantity or share
4: the group or political party having the greater number of votes (as in a legislature)
5: the military office, rank, or commission of a major
May I suggest that you read bit further own the page next time?
I did a bit more research into your other claim and could only find that an anonymous “Hilary Clinton supporter” first raised the issue in an email they passed around. If the person who wrote the email were anonymous how would anyone know for sure if they supported Hilary Clinton?
I found quotes that purported to be from the offending email but never the actual email itself.
The Bloomberg article you cited had a link to a memo written by Mark Penn to Mrs. Clinton in 2008. In the memo Penn advised Clinton to “save it for 2050” and wrote “We are never going to say anything about his background…”
After further research, I submit that it may in fact have been a Hilary Clinton supporter who first floated the idea (We’ll never know for sure, probably) but it was REPUBLICANS who took it to the extreme.
Rainbow Dash, you seem to have a problem with telling the whole truth. You omitted key parts of the linked definition, so here is the COMPLETE definition:
Definition of MAJORITY plural majorities
1. obsolete : the quality or state of being greater
2. a : the age at which full civil rights are accorded
b : the status of one who has attained this age
3. a : a number or percentage equaling more than half of a total
b : the excess of a majority over the remainder of the total : MARGIN
c : the greater quantity or share
4. the group or political party having the greater number of votes (as in a legislature)
5. the military office, rank, or commission of a major
Note that 3a seems more geared to an election’s voting totals (to which I’m referring). 3b refers to election margin. 4a refers to a group or political party “(as in a legislature)”.
The most apt description of Bill Clinton’s 1992 and 1996 Presidential victories is that he won a PLURALITY, NOT a MAJORITY. Here is a description and link that explains it:
“In the United States, Presidential plurality victories are those elections in which the winning candidate received less than 50% of the popular votes cast but the largest share of votes…..
“19 presidential elections have occurred in which a candidate was elected or reelected WITHOUT GAINING A MAJORITY (my highlights) of the popular vote.
“The following is a list and description of those elections in which a candidate won the election with a plurality of the popular vote….” Included in that list are the elections of 1992 and 1996.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States'_presidential_plurality_victories
May I suggest you not selectively edit and actually research a topic next time?
You did a more candid review of the birther issue. I provided you 3 direct quotes from Bloomberg News, Factcheck.org, and USA Today, which support what I wrote – that it originated with a Hillary Clinton supporter. It should surprise no one that once Barack Obama secured the Democratic nomination, no Democrats would want raise the birther issue again. That the birther issue continued after Obama assumed the Presidency shows how both political parties like to use a petty irritant – like the stories of Bill Clinton’s rocky marriage, George W. Bush’s college antics, or Donald Trump’s divorce proceedings.
When my comments posted, the examples for each of the definitions dropped off – the publishing software apparently doesn’t accept verbiage enclosed in angle brackets. Hopefully the examples will post this time with parentheses instead:
1. obsolete : the quality or state of being greater
2. a : the age at which full civil rights are accorded (The age of majority in the U.S. is 18.)
b : the status of one who has attained this age (graduated … before he had attained his majority — W. L. Burrage)
3. a : a number or percentage equaling more than half of a total (a majority of voters) (a two-thirds majority)
b : the excess of a majority over the remainder of the total : MARGIN(won by a majority of 10 votes)
c : the greater quantity or share (the majority of the time)
4. the group or political party having the greater number of votes (as in a legislature)
5. the military office, rank, or commission of a major (majorities and colonelcies were thick as June blackberries — Dixon Wecter)
Were ID’s required for people to vote in California? I heard they weren’t, but don’t know the truth, do you?
Well Bob and Real Life Dork are both Hillary supporters ! That should do it !!! L0L. ! wait for it ha ha ha ha ha ha !
Following Trump’s lead, I suppose the Utah GOP is claiming that “busloads” of protesters are being sent to Utah. The Utah Republican delegation, starting with Shifty Chaffetz, is a cowardly crew unwilling to take any heat for what’s happening in the country under their so-called leadership.
I got a chuckle out of this line from the story above accusing the opposion of “…sending an “organized mob” meant to sew disruption and chaos.”
Would that be cross-stitch or a simple basting. A stitch in time does sometimes save nine.
Thanks for pointing that out, Anybody Home. Yes, those mobs are pretty wild and crazy, and those sewing needles may just poke an eye out 🙂
Correction made.
Paul Dail
ST. GEORGE NEWS
Editor, Reporter