Senators introduce amendment protecting against indefinite detention

stock image | St. George News

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Sens. Mike Lee, R-Utah, Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., Susan Collins, R-Maine, Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Ted Cruz, R-Texas, have introduced the Due Process Guarantee amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act, designed to protect Americans from being detained indefinitely without charge or trial.

According to a press release issued by Lee’s office Tuesday, the amendment aims to end ongoing legal ambiguities by affirming and strengthening the principles behind the Non-Detention Act of 1971.

Lee said:

America should never waiver in vigilantly pursuing those who would commit, or plot to commit, acts of treason against our country. But the federal government should not be allowed to indefinitely imprison any American on the mere accusation of treason without affording them the due process guaranteed by our Constitution.

By forbidding the government from detaining Americans without trial absent explicit congressional approval, the Due Process Guarantee amendment strikes the right balance between protecting our security and the civil liberties of each citizen.

In recent years, some have argued that the indefinite detention of Americans is permissible under the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force, Lee’s press release said. The Due Process Guarantee amendment clarifies that the AUMF and other general authorizations cannot be construed as acts of Congress that permit indefinite detention and codifies the clear statement rule to clarify that indefinite detention can only occur if Congress expressly authorizes it.

Cruz said:

The Constitution does not allow President Obama, or any President, to apprehend an American citizen, arrested on U.S. soil, and detain these citizens indefinitely without a trial. That’s why I have consistently supported measures to prohibit indefinite detention in the NDAA. The Due Process Guarantee amendment will prohibit the President’s ability to indefinitely detain U.S. citizens arrested on American soil without trial or due process. While we must vigorously protect national security by pursuing violent terrorists and preventing acts of terror, we must also ensure our most basic rights as American citizens are protected.

Feinstein said:

Detaining Americans captured within the United States indefinitely without trial or even charge is a clear violation of our Constitution and our values, and it must not be permitted. We’ve seen over and over again that our criminal justice system is well-equipped to interrogate and convict terrorists, and I support that process. We need to stand strong against terrorism, and we need to do so within the bounds of U.S. law. This amendment has been approved by the Senate in the past but not enacted; I’m hopeful that this year it will be adopted by both chambers of Congress.

Paul said:

The indefinite detention of a U.S. citizen without due process is fundamentally un-American. Our founding fathers believed so firmly in the right to trial by jury that they enshrined it in the body of the Constitution and again in the Sixth Amendment. We can, and will, vigorously investigate and prosecute all who seek to do us harm, and we can do so while respecting the constitutional liberties of American citizens.

The bill also expands the Non-Detention Act of 1971 to include legal permanent residents in addition to citizens.

In December 2012, the Senate passed this amendment to the fiscal year 2013 National Defense Authorization Act with 67 votes, but it stalled in the House of Representatives. This legislation is almost identical to that language.

Related posts

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @stgnews

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!

1 Comment

  • native born new mexican June 13, 2015 at 9:46 am

    This absolutely needs to be done. You would think that the constitution would have made this clear enough but it seems there are those who can’t or won’t understand the Constitution so it has to be restated again in this way because they didn’t get it the first time. If there are no proven charges, there is no jail time. It is that simple.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.