Planning commission tables zone change on Boulder Creek developments

St. George City Planning Commission meeting, St. George, Utah, March 11, 2014 | Photo by Scott Heinecke, St. George News

ST. GEORGE — At Tuesday’s 5 p.m. semimonthly meeting, the St. George City Planning Commission tabled deciding on a zone change application by Stephen Sheffield, representing his company Shefco, with regard to the Boulder Creek Commons and Boulder Creek Crossing developments, to allow the developer at least 30 days to complete a traffic study and satisfy other requirements of the city.

The Boulder commercial developments are planned in the area of 1450 South River Road.

Because Sheffield has added a 116,000-square-foot Smith’s Marketplace as an anchor store to the master plan, the City requested that Sheffield provide a traffic study, an updated rendering of the buildings to be included in the project and a noise mitigation plan.

The commission said that the addition of a large anchor store and 16 other buildings in the project master plan will create substantial traffic issues to be addressed: where the entrances should be located, turning movements and related traffic flow. The last traffic study is dated, having been completed in 2004 when the Summit Athletic Club was built nearby on East 1450 South, which intersects perpendicular to River Road where the Boulder centers are planned.

The updated rendering of the anchor store should especially show the front and back sides, the commission said.

In addition the city wants a noise mitigation plan completed, expressing concerns about noise that may arise at the loading dock, trash compactor and traffic in and around the anchor store in particular.

Sheffield addressed the commission saying the master plan was adopted in the 1980s showing this area as a neighborhood center.

“We have really been working hard to make everything happen,” Sheffield said.

Many of the improvements to the road and development of the trail system there, he said, were made at a huge sacrifice to his family budget while waiting out the recession.

The Smith’s Marketplace as an anchor was not included in the original application because there had been no sure commitment made by them, largely due to funding, Sheffield said. Boulder Creek Commons is one location they, Smiths Marketplace, are interested in, but it is not at the top of their list, he said, therefore it is yet unknown if they will be the anchor store.

Sheffield added the anchor store as a concession to his neighbors, he said, and since he lives there on the edge of the development himself, he would have to look at it every day and therefore wants to make sure it is done right.

Sheffield told St. George News this project will be approved, that it is just a matter of working out the details to minimize the negative impacts and maximize the positives.

“I have spent a decade-plus, working out the final details,” Sheffield said. About 95 percent of the people that came to the neighborhood meetings like it once they find out about the details, he said,  it is the fear of the unknown that drives some to question it.

Some concerns expressed by neighbors have included the impact on property values, increases in traffic, environmental concerns and possible crime the development may bring to the area.

In response to the concerns, Sheffield said that property values will increase because it will bring needed services to the area and reduce traffic and crime problems. “We can make it look better than the field of weeds we have there now,” he said, “then it’s an upgrade.”

As far as concerns about increasing crime, Sheffield pointed to areas in Bloomington and Santa Clara where similar developments have not impacted the crime rates. There would be more lighting, security cameras and walls built in addition to a greater police presence, he said.

Traffic problems are a valid concern, Sheffield said, but the traffic problems are largely the result of the increase in the number of houses built in the area. Having the stores closer to residents will actually improve traffic conditions, he said, since those living in the area will not have to travel so far to get to shopping centers.

Environmental concerns raised by some neighbors concerning the Jiffy Lube going in close to the Virgin River are a nonissue, Sheffield said, because that business has already been approved for construction by the city.

Paul Gooch, a St. George resident in the Little Valley area attended a neighborhood meeting that Sheffield held. He is impressed that Sheffield lives in the area himself, he said.

Sheffield has to live with the consequences of whatever he puts into place at Boulder Creek Commons, Gooch said, “unlike some developers who make a mess and don’t have to live with it. I see this as a guy who is aware of the effects of what he is doing.”

At Sheffield’s request, the commission tabled the application for at least 30 days to give him time to complete the traffic study and other items the city is requesting. 

Related posts

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @STGnews

Copyright St. George News, LLC, 2014, all rights reserved.

St. George City Planning Commission meeting, St. George, Utah, March 11, 2014 | Photo by Scott Heinecke, St. George News
St. George City Planning Commission meeting, St. George, Utah, March 11, 2014 | Photo by Scott Heinecke, St. George News


Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!


  • DisgustedNeighbor March 14, 2014 at 8:17 pm

    Special thanks to Mr. Sheffield and his “sacrifice” all these years.
    He is single handedly ruining the property values of dozens of homes with his vision. Which is far different from the little boutique style shops he claimed was going in.
    People paid big money for those lots to not have a supermarket view. And yes they saved and often times sacrificed certain things to afford those lots and homes.
    Funny how he sold his lot on the edge to move further into the Boulders. He sure saved his poor family from having to look down on the mess.
    Apparently he hasn’t made enough money off of The Boulders and other construction projects.
    Pure greed followed up by lies and twisted tales to get what he wanted.
    Thanks Brother.

    • Real Neighbor March 15, 2014 at 9:03 am

      Apparently this neighbor doesn’t know what he/she is talking about. Mr. Sheffield lives right on the ridge and has more to loose than anyone. This is cyber bullying.

      • DISGUSTEDNEIGHBOR March 15, 2014 at 3:23 pm

        Sorry but having an opposing opinion is not called cyber bullying. I am not harassing and or threatening by expressing my deep dismay and distrust over what he has done.
        So he moved back? The last I saw he sold his home on the edge and had moved into the interior. My apologies. Does not change the fact that he told longtime residents that the “shops” were to be small, up scale affairs not a Smith’s and its parking lots.

      • Chris March 15, 2014 at 8:46 pm

        He may also have more to “lose”

    • TheMajorityofNeigbhors March 15, 2014 at 6:15 pm

      Excuse me … but do not be fooled into thinking that you are the only neighbor with an opinion. While we are all entitled to one, it is important for you, and anyone reading this to know that the vast majority of neighbors and community are thrilled to see this project enrich this area. It will do nothing but improve the quality of life for thousands of families. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised to see you picking up some milk from your supposed evil “smith’s” within the week of its opening. Drop your crusade, and don’t be fooled by this person claiming to be the voice of the majority … you simply are NOT.

  • Julie March 15, 2014 at 12:46 pm

    I’m excited for this development — especially Smith’s Marketplace!!!

  • I Wonder March 15, 2014 at 5:09 pm

    If “DisgustedNeighbor” is actually somehow tied in with the nearest supermarket, and is afraid of the competition that this development might generate.

  • Tom Kaczmarek April 15, 2014 at 11:39 pm

    No doubt Smiths would be a great addition to this neck of the desert but I would rather have seen a more wholesome food store like Whole Foods or better yet Sprouts Farmers Market that has better values and already has 3 stores up north in UT.

  • Big Bob December 1, 2014 at 8:38 pm

    Seems plans have changed cince this story in March. I saw a sign advertising future site of Smith’s MP at the corner of Mall Dr and Riverside near the new Mall Dr. brodge.

  • koolaid December 1, 2014 at 9:04 pm

    More churches are needed there, at least one on every block tithe up to pay for them

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.