ADOT proposes toll road through the Virgin River Gorge

adot toll road virgin river gorge
ADOT hopes to put a toll road through the Virgin River Gorge to pay for I-15 repairs.

VIRGIN RIVER GORGE – Southern Utah residents may have to pay to travel through the Gorge if the Arizona Department of Transportation gets its way.

ADOT is asking the federal government to allow a toll road on the 12-mile stretch of Interstate 15 that goes through Arizona. It was not a well-known plan until Las Vegas media got wind of it.

According to the Las Vegas Review Journal, the toll seems to be aimed at truckers, but ADOT apparently never told the Arizona Trucking Association about the request.

The Review Journal quoted a letter from Karen Rasmussen, president of the Arizona Trucking Association.

“Clearly ADOT did not contact any of its industry stakeholders and are laying the ‘blame’ on this on our State Transportation Board,” Rasmussen wrote in a letter disseminated to members. “This thing has legs. I’ve gotten a call from our congressional offices wanting to know our position, and we have several key state legislators who’ve come out in support of this.”

According to the ADOT website, the stretch of I-15 going through the Gorge is in desperate need of repair, but so few Arizona residents travel that road, it would be unfair to ask Arizona taxpayers to saddle the burden of those costs.

“The Arizona stretch of I-15 is several decades old and is in need of rehabilitation,” according to ADOT. “The most urgent, and costly, element of work is eight bridge rehabilitations that all cross the Virgin River within the Virgin River Gorge. All have been identified by ADOT engineers as deficient or near-deficient. Because of the difficult terrain, the work will be costly, estimated at approximately $165 million. Safety features such as widened shoulders, enhanced guardrails, and signage are also needed.”

ADOT says there are 29.4 miles of Arizona roads between Nevada and Utah state lines, and serves only 1,200 Arizona residents.

“However, I-15 is an important national route, connecting San Diego to the Canadian border in Montana. It is recognized as a Corridor of National Significance because it is critical to freight movement from the southern California ports to the central United States, and has also been selected by USDOT as one of six Corridors of the Future, as well as being part of the federally designated Canamex corridor.”

It’s those truckers that ADOT appears to be targeting. Of the 20,000 to 24,000 vehicles that travel that stretch of road each day, only 24 percent of the traffic is trucks. But preliminary estimates are asking truckers to pay $8 per truck and $1-2 per passenger vehicles, according to the ADOT website. The Review Journal states the tolls could be $6 per truck and $3 per passenger vehicles.

However, ADOT must get approval from the Federal Highway Administration because it is “tolling an existing interstate.”

Because of the difficult terrain, the estimated cost to fix I-15 is $165 million. ADOT has already set aside $3 million. They hope to have the road fixed by 2017.

ADOT is currently in talks with Nevada and Utah “about the possibility of using a public private partnership to finance the construction and tolling to repay the investment.”

[email protected]

Copyright 2011 St. George News. This material may not be published or rewritten without written consent.

Free News Delivery by Email

Would you like to have the day's news stories delivered right to your inbox every evening? Enter your email below to start!


  • Shawn October 24, 2011 at 2:23 pm

    That is such crap. Charge a toll really? Don’t you charge a gas tax to pay for road ways? Don’t Trucks already pay enough in fee’s? They already have to pay to drive in whatever state they travel. Its a Interstate they get Money from the GOV to take care of it

  • Earl October 24, 2011 at 4:55 pm

    Here we go again, more fee’s and taxes because state and federal governments have no accountability on tax dollars spent. We all pay state and federal fuel taxes and more but the money is taken and used to pay for wasteful spending by the governments. Going to a flat rate tax or any tax does not solve our problems, it is the wasteful spending and complete lack of accountability on tax dollars spent, control spending and then let’s talk about taxes.

  • Not a Mormon October 24, 2011 at 6:09 pm

    I’m not sure what’s worse…..the proposed toll or the designation as the “canamex highway”……. this bodes ill. I hated NAFTA when it was drafted and I hate it now.

    This is nothing but bad ideas.

    Utah should annex this corridor, Beaver Dam, and Littlefield so Arizona doesn’t have anything to do with it.

  • Dee Mygrant October 25, 2011 at 8:03 pm

    That is ridiculous. We will go back to taking the old route!!

  • Steve December 7, 2011 at 4:53 pm

    The fact of the matter is that it is a designated NAFTA route, and moreover Canadians and a lot of people further north use it to get to Arizona, Nevada and California. There is no other alternate route (other than Highway 89, which is a tough drive in the winter through the mountains) and the burden of the tolls wouldn’t fall on truckers, it would fall on the residents of Mesquite and St. George. This is a bad idea. I do agree the burden falls unfairly on Arizona taxpayers who rarely use the road. A more radical solution would be for Utah to annex that part of Arizona.

  • Sandra December 8, 2011 at 2:10 pm

    I agree that it would seem a more radical idea for Utah to annex the corridor of land between Mesquite, NV and St. George, UT. But…what if the area were divided equally, so that Mesquite took the 8mi’s (or so) from NV’s border to the Utah border, and Utah took the balance of land. The gorge could qualify as a regional or national recreation park, given the rich history and diverse environments there. It fits perfectly with Utah’s lifestyle and focus. Having the riverfront land in Beaver Dam would serve Nevada well; think of Boulder, AZ and Laughlin, NV. I can’t help but believe it’s a win/win/ WIN! situation of all concerned.

  • Sandra December 8, 2011 at 2:12 pm

    I should have written equitably, not equally…but the equitable gains achieved in dividing that space would have benefits to both Utah and Nevada…and of course free-up Arizona to focus on it’s own infrastructure.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.